主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊 中国科技核心期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》入选期刊

Chinese Nursing Management ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 401-406.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.03.016

• Evidence-based Nursing • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction models for Peristomal Moisture-Associated Skin Damage in patients with enterostomy: a Meta-analysis

WANG Xiaoying, HU Yali, LIU Fang, LI Zhuoyun, WANG Hongyan, WANG Jiaming   

  1. Ward 1, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China
  • Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-15

Abstract: Objective: To analyze existing prediction models for the risk of Peristomal Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (PMASD) in patients with enterostomy and provide references for model optimization. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Chinese and English databases for studies related to PMASD, the search period extended from database inception to March 7, 2025. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data from the literature. Meta-analysis of effect sizes for common predictors across models was performed using Stata 16.0 software. Results: A total of 6 studies were included, all of which reported AUC values >0.8, indicating good predictive performance. However, the overall risk of bias in these studies was relatively high. Gender, stoma site, stoma height, presence of a surgical incision in the peristomal area, soft diet, semi-liquid diet, and history of radiotherapy/chemotherapy were significant predictors of PMASD (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Most existing models demonstrate strong discriminative ability during development, yet there is room for improvement in methodological rigor and clinical applicability. Future development of prediction models should prioritize the common predictors identified in this Meta-analysis, with emphasis on methodological robustness, model validation, and standardization of definitions.

Key words: enterostomy; moisture-associated skin damage; risk prediction model; systematic review; Meta-analysis

CLC Number: R47;R197