主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12): 1814-1818.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2024.12.011

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美《老年护理学》本科教材建设的比较研究

宋红丹 杨宇帆 于明明   

  1. 北京大学护理学院,100191北京市
  • 出版日期:2024-12-15 发布日期:2024-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 于明明,博士,副教授,E-mail:yumm@hsc.pku.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:宋红丹,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    教育部护理学专业虚拟教研室教育教学研究课题(2022HLXN19)

Comparison of the construction of textbook of Geriatric Nursing for undergraduates between China and the United States

SONG Hongdan, YANG Yufan, YU Mingming   

  1. School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
  • Online:2024-12-15 Published:2024-12-15
  • Contact: E-mail:yumm@hsc.pku.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:系统比较中美两国《老年护理学》本科教材的异同,明确我国《老年护理学》本科教材的优势和不足,为《老年护理学》本科教材建设的完善提出建议。方法:以中国、美国的《老年护理学》本科教材为研究对象,采用文献回顾和专家咨询法确定比较框架,对两国教材进行深入比较和分析。结果:中美两国的《老年护理学》本科教材在编写理念、结构和内容等方面均有相似点,如以整体护理观为指导,遵循从人群衰老到个体衰老、从一般问题到专科问题、从生理到心理到环境再到社会、从患病到临终的逻辑编排内容等。不同点在于,中国教材的亮点是教学目标层次清晰;美国教材的优点是偏向能力、人文情感等的培养,注重研究内容的引入与更新。结论:中美《老年护理学》本科教材的编写各有千秋,我国教材有自身明显优势,美国教材在内容、结构、呈现等方面也有可借鉴之处。我国教材在保持优势的同时,应适当调整教材结构、使用单元共享案例、推动智慧化信息化教学、增加本土化和人文关怀的内容要素、提升教材呈现度、更新编写理念,提高教材的编写水平。

关键词: 老年护理学;教材建设;比较研究

Abstract: Objective: To systematically compare the similarities and differences of the undergraduate textbook of Geriatric Nursing between China and the United States. Methods: Two textbooks of Geriatric Nursing in China and the United States were selected. A comparative framework was developed based on the literature review and expert consultations, and a comprehensive and in-depth comparison was carried out based on the pre-determined framework. Results: There were similarities in philosophy, structures and contents between the two textbooks. For example, both of the two books were guided by holistic nursing and they both follow the logic arrangement of contents from population aging to individual aging, from general to specialist, from physiology, psychology, environment to society, and from illness to dying. The difference was that Chinese textbook was with clear and measurable learning objectives while American textbook emphasized more on cultivation of humanities ability and introduction of the updated research findings. Conclusion: Geriatric Nursing textbooks in China and the United States have their own advantages, and the textbook in American can be used as reference. It is suggested that Geriatric Nursing textbooks in China could adjust the structure, use units sharing cases, promote intelligent teaching, enrich the content elements of localization and humanistic care, improve the presentation, and update writing ideas in time to further improve the textbook while maintaining its own advantages. This study is of great significance to discipline development and further promoting the process of active aging in China.

Key words: geriatric nursing; textbook construction; comparative study

中图分类号:  R47;R197