主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12): 1785-1791.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2024.12.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

以人为中心照护的实践清单—工作人员版量表的跨文化调适

王珊珊 李彤 吴林 刘雪 纪文文 李怡曼 王彦   

  1. 河北大学护理学院,071000 河北省保定市
  • 出版日期:2024-12-15 发布日期:2024-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 王彦,硕士,教授,硕士生导师,E-mail:chjanwy@163.com
  • 作者简介:王珊珊,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    河北省引进国外智力项目(606999919005)

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff

WANG Shanshan, LI Tong, WU Lin, LIU Xue, JI Wenwen, LI Yiman, WANG Yan   

  1. College of Nursing, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei province, 071000, China
  • Online:2024-12-15 Published:2024-12-15
  • Contact: E-mail:chjanwy@163.com

摘要: 目的:对以人为中心照护的实践清单—工作人员版(the Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff,PCPI-S)量表进行跨文化调适,以全面评估我国养老实践“以人为中心照护”服务质量。方法:根据美国矫形外科医师学会循证医学委员会推荐指南,对源量表进行正译-综合-回译-专家委员会等价性评价-预调查,形成PCPI-S测试版。2022年11月至2023年3月,采用便利抽样法对410位符合纳入和排除标准的养老机构工作人员进行问卷调查,以验证量表的信度和效度。结果:中文版PCPI-S量表包括先决条件、护理环境、护理过程3个分量表,15个维度和59个条目;内容效度指数为0.915,探索性因子分析3个分量表累计方差贡献率分别为60.431%、68.564%、73.298%;量表的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.948,重测信度为0.952。结论:经跨文化调适,中文版PCPI-S量表具有较高的信度和效度,可用来评价养老机构“以人为中心照护”的服务质量。

关键词: 以人为中心照护的实践清单—工作人员版;量表;跨文化调适;信度;效度

Abstract: Objective: To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) scale, so as to use it in a comprehensive assessment of the quality of Person-Centered Care in elderly care practice in China. Methods: According to the guideline recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, we conducted forward-translation, synthesis, back-translation, equivalence-evaluation of expert committee, and pilot testing. A questionnaire was distributed to 410 eligible staff of elderly care institutions from November 2022 to March 2023 via convenience sampling to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: The Chinese version of the PCPI-S had three subscales including prerequisites, care environment and care process, with 15 dimensions and 59 items. The content validity index was 0.915, and the cumulative variance contribution rates of the three subscales were 60.431%, 68.564%, and 73.298%, respectively. Cronbach's α coefficient for the total scale was 0.948, and the test-retest reliability was 0.952. Conclusion: The cross-culturally adapted PCPI-S scale has high reliability and validity. It can be used to evaluate the service quality of Person-Centered Care in elderly care institutions.

Key words: the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff; scale; cross-cultural adaptation; reliability; validity

中图分类号:  R47;R197