主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 867-871.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2024.06.013

• 手术患者管理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

手术室护士应用压力性损伤评估量表促进及障碍因素的质性研究

蒋维连 刘琳娜 梁菡 王秀梅 陈娟 廖芯 卢秀英 彭俊华   

  1. 桂林医学院第二附属医院手术室,541199 广西壮族自治区桂林市(蒋维连,梁菡);青岛市市立医院东院麻醉手术科(刘琳娜);山西白求恩医院手术室(王秀梅);青海省人民医院手术室(陈娟);四川大学华西第二医院手术室(廖芯);四川省肿瘤医院手术室(卢秀英);遵义市第一人民医院手术室(彭俊华)
  • 出版日期:2024-06-15 发布日期:2024-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘琳娜,本科,主管护师,护士长,E-mail:Lln-0908@163.com
  • 作者简介:蒋维连,本科,副主任护师
  • 基金资助:
    广西医疗卫生适宜技术开发与推广应用项目(S2021014);广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z-C20220967);桂林医学院第二附属医院临床基础能力提升项目(2023gyefylc020);广西医疗卫生重点培育学科建设项目

Facilitators and barriers of nurses implementing pressure injury assessment scale: a qualitative study

JIANG Weilian, LIU Linna, LIANG Han, WANG Xiumei, CHEN Juan, LIAO Xin, LU Xiuying, PENG Junhua   

  1. Operating Room, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Automous Region, 541199, China
  • Online:2024-06-15 Published:2024-06-15
  • Contact: 护士长,E-mail:Lln-0908@163.com

摘要: 目的:基于护士视角,探索应用术中获得性压力性损伤评估量表的促进与障碍因素,为临床提升压力性损伤评估质量提供借鉴。方法:采用描述性质性研究方法,以理论域框架为理论指导制定访谈提纲,选取广西、山东、山西、四川、贵州的6家三级甲等医院的11名手术室护士进行半结构式深入访谈,采用定向内容分析法归纳并提炼主题。结果:促进因素包括临床需求强、量表的可行性好、量表的权威性强;障碍因素包括环境限制、护士缺乏信心、护士间行为存在差异、医院信息系统智能性欠佳、患者参与不足。结论:手术室护士在应用量表评估过程中既有促进因素,也存在一定障碍因素,应重视量表的实践意义,完善培训、护理流程及辅助工具,推进量表的临床应用。

关键词: 压力性损伤;手术;理论域框架;促进因素;障碍因素;质性研究

Abstract: Objective: From the perspective of nurses, to explore the facilitators and barriers of the implementation of the intraoperative acquired pressure injury risk assessment scale (hereinafter referred to as the scale) and to provide insights for improving the clinical evaluation quality. Methods: This study was a descriptive qualitative research, crafting interview outline guided by theoretical domain framework. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 operating room nurses from 6 tertiary hospitals in Guangxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, and Guizhou province. Oriented content analysis was used to summarize and extract the themes. Results: The facilitators included strong clinical demand, good feasibility, and authority of the scale. The barriers included environmental constraints, lack of confidence among nurses, behavioral differences among nurses, poor intelligence of hospital information systems, and insufficient patient participation. Conclusion: There are both promoting factors and hindering factors in the process of scale evaluation. Nurses need to attach importance to the practical significance of scale, improve training, nursing process and auxiliary tools, and promote the clinical application of scale.

Key words: pressure injury; surgery; Theoretical Domain Framework; facilitators; barriers; qualitative study

中图分类号:  R47;R197;R49