主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7): 1049-1055.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.07.017

• 延续护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

儿童慢性病延续性护理质量评价指标体系的构建

冷虹瑶 王紫娟 应本娟 石林 张湛美 郑显兰   

  1. 国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心,儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室,儿科学重庆市重点实验室,重庆医科大学附属儿童医院护理部,400014重庆市(冷虹瑶,郑显兰);呼吸中心(王紫娟,张湛美);新生儿外科(应本娟);肾脏内科(石林)
  • 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2022-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 郑显兰,硕士,主任护师,教授,护理部主任,E-mail:zhengxianlan@vip.163.com
  • 作者简介:冷虹瑶,博士在读,主管护师
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市儿童医疗保障创新研究示范基地项目(NCRCCHD-2019-HP-14)

Construction of the quality evaluation index system for transitional care of pediatric patients with chronic diseases

LENG Hongyao, WANG Zijuan, YING Benjuan, SHI Lin, ZHANG Zhanmei, ZHENG Xianlan   

  1. Department of Nursing, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China
  • Online:2022-07-15 Published:2022-07-15
  • Contact: E-mail:zhengxianlan@vip.163.com

摘要: 目的:构建儿童慢性病延续性护理质量评价指标体系,以期为评价儿童慢性病延续性护理质量提供全面、系统、可量化的评价工具。方法:通过文献检索和半结构式访谈拟定评价指标条目池,以结构-过程-结果三维质量理论模型为框架形成专家函询问卷初稿,通过2轮专家函询和1次专家论证会完成质量指标体系的构建。结果:两轮专家函询问卷的有效回收率分别为91.67%和100.00%,专家权威系数分别为0.866和0.877,肯德尔协调系数分别为0.156和0.176(P<0.01);专家论证会对指标逐条解读和调整,形成了包括一级指标3个、二级指标12个、三级指标56个的儿童慢性病延续性护理质量评价指标体系。结论:儿童慢性病延续性护理评价指标体系具有较好的科学性、全面性和较广泛的适用性。

关键词: 儿童;慢性病;延续性护理;质量指标;卫生保健

Abstract: Objective: To construct the quality evaluation index system for transitional care of pediatric patients with chronic diseases. Methods: Literature review and semi-structured interview were performed to form the initial quality indicators, the Donabedian structure-process-outcome quality of care model was used to organize those quality indicators to form the questionnaire for Delphi expert inquiry. Then two rounds of Delphi experts survey were performed to evaluate the importance and clarity of each indicators. At last, administrative experts from government, hospital, and patient family represents were gathered together to evaluate the comprehensibility of each indicator and the value of outcome indicators in socioeconomic areas to form the final evaluation index system. Results: 22 experts finished the expert inquiry. The effective recovery rate of the two rounds were 91.67% and 100.00%, respectively, expert authority coefficients were 0.866 and 0.877, Kendall coordination coefficient were 0.156 and 0.176 (P<0.01). Expert demonstrated and adjusted the indicators one by one. The final evaluation index system for transitional care quality of pediatric including 3 first-level indicators, 12 secondary-level indicators and 56 third-level indicators. Conclusion: The evaluation index system for transitional care quality of pediatric is a scientific, comprehensive and practical evaluation tool.

Key words: child; chronic disease; transitional care; quality indicators; health care

中图分类号:  R47; R197