主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

• 国际视角 • 上一篇    

重症监护室内患者睡眠的自评和护士评估:一项探索性描述研究

Leanne M. Aitken Rosalind Elliott Marion Mitchell Chelsea Davis Bonnie Macfarlane Amanda Ullman Krista Wetzig Ashika Datt Sharon McKinley   

  1. 澳大利亚昆士兰格里菲斯大学护理和助产学院(Leanne M. Aitken,Marion Mitchell);澳大利亚昆士兰梦席斯健康研究所卓越护理研究中心(NHMRC)(Leanne M. Aitken,Marion Mitchell,Bonnie Macfarlane,Amanda Ullman);澳大利亚昆士兰Woolloongabba Princess Alexandra医院(Leanne M. Aitken,Marion Mitchell,Chelsea Davis,Krista Wetzig);英国伦敦市立大学健康科学学院(Leanne M.Aitken);澳大利亚悉尼科技大学健康学院(Rosalind Elliott);澳大利亚悉尼皇家北岸医院重症监护室(Rosalind Elliott,Sharon McKinley);澳大利亚悉尼科技大学理学院(Ashika Datt)
  • 出版日期:2017-04-25 发布日期:2017-04-25

Sleep assessment by patients and nurses in the intensive care: an exploratory descriptive study

  • Online:2017-04-25 Published:2017-04-25

摘要: 目的:描述ICU患者的睡眠自评报告,检测患者的睡眠自评报告和床旁护士的睡眠评估报告之间的关系;描述患者建议的促进睡眠的对策。方法:对2014-2015年间连续纳入的能进行交流的成年患者,进行了探索性描述研究。患者睡眠情况采用理查兹-坎贝尔(Richards-Campbell)睡眠问卷(评分范围为0~100 mm;得分越高,表明睡眠质量越好)进行自评,同时护士以5级递进形式记录患者睡眠情况,进行评估。要求患者每日描述辅助或妨碍睡眠的因素。研究已获得伦理委员会批准。进行描述性统计分析[中位数(四分位间距) ];用Spearman等级相关分析相关关系,用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行差异检验; P<0.05时,认为差异有显著性。结果:151名受试者纳入研究,年龄为60(46~71)岁,ICU停留时间为4(2~9)天,完成了356份睡眠自评报告。自我感知的睡眠质量为46(26~65) mm。睡眠的患者自评和护士评估之间存在中度相关(Spearman等级相关系数为0.39~0.50; P<0.001)。经患者认可的改善睡眠的对策包括适当的止痛和镇静药物,平和舒适的环境,以及集群护理、耳塞等物理措施。结论:患者在ICU期间,完成睡眠自评的中位数为2(1~3)日,表明常规使用自评是可行的。自评报告显示患者的睡眠质量低。在患者自评的多种辅助或妨碍睡眠的因素中,环境因素和影响患者舒适度的因素是最常见的。应实施针对这些因素的干预,以改善患者睡眠状况。

Abstract: Objective: To describe ICU patients’ self-report assessment of sleep, examine the relationship between patients' self-reported sleep and their reported sleep by the bedside nurse, and describe the strategies suggested by patients to promote sleep. Methods: An exploratory descriptive study was undertaken with communicative adult patients consecutively recruited in 2014–2015. Patients reported sleep using the Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (score range 0-100 mm; higher score indicates better sleep quality), with nursing assessment of sleep documented across a five level ordinal variable. Patients were asked daily to describe strategies that helped or hindered their sleep. Ethical approval for the study was gained. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed [ median (interquartile range) ]; relationships were tested using Spearman's rank correlation and differences assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test; P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Participants (n=151) were recruited [age: 60 (46-71) years; ICU length of stay 4 (2-9) days] with 356 self-reports of sleep. Median perceived sleep quality was 46 (26-65) mm. A moderate relationship existed between patients’ self-assessment and nurses’ assessment of sleep (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.39-0.50; P<0.001). Strategies identified by patients to improve sleep included adequate pain relief and sedative medication, a peaceful and comfortable environment and physical interventions, e.g. clustering care, ear plugs. Conclusion: Patients reported on their sleep a median of 2 (1-3) days during their ICU stay, suggesting that routine use of self-report was feasible. These reports revealed low sleep quality. Patients reported multiple facilitators and barriers for sleep, with environmental and patient comfort factors being most common. Interventions that target these factors to improve patient sleep should be implemented.