ICU患者不适评估量表的汉化及信度、效度研究

ICU患者不适评估量表的汉化及信度、效度研究

解艳红蔡学联史平冯怡陈燕邵圣文

湖州师范学院医学院护理学院

出版日期:2015-05-25 发布日期:2015-05-25

Chinesization of Inconforts des Patients de RE Animation (IPREA ) and its reliability and validity testing

Online:2015-05-25 Published:2015-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：译制中文版ICU 患者不适评估量表（Inconforts des Patients de RE Animation，IPREA），并对其信度、效度进行初步评价。方法：翻译并修订法语版IPREA 量表，使用汉化的IPREA 量表对185 例从ICU 转出的清醒患者进行问卷调查，并对结果进行信度、效度检验。结果：中文版的IPREA 量表保留17 个条目，共3 个维度，各维度与量表总分之间的相关系数为0.562 ～ 0.899，内容效度（CVI) 为0.920 ；Cronbach’s α 系数为0.834，各维度Cronbach’s α 系数为0.705 ～ 0.782，其重测信度为0.871，因子分析得出3 个公因子，累计方差贡献率为60.066％。结论：中文版IPREA 量表具有良好的信度、效度，适合中国文化背景下ICU 患者不适程度的评估。

Abstract: Objective: To translate the French version of ICU patients' discomfort into Chinese, and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPREA. Methods: The IPREA was translated and adapted according to Chinese culture. The reliability and validity of Chinese version of IPREA was tested with 185 ICU patients. Results: The Chinese version of IPREA consisted of 17 items in three dimensions. The correlation coefficient between each dimension and the total score was 0.562~0.899,and the content validity index was 0.920. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the overall scale was 0.834, and 0.705~0.782 for the three dimensions. The test-retest reliability was 0.871 for the overall scale.Three factors were extracted by factor analysis, which could explain 60.066% of the total variance. Conclusion: The Chinese version of IPREA has acceptable reliability and validity. It can be used to measure the discomfort level of ICU patients in Chinese medical environment.

解艳红蔡学联史平冯怡陈燕邵圣文. ICU患者不适评估量表的汉化及信度、效度研究[J]. , 2015, 15(5): 567-571.