早产儿疼痛评估工具使用研究相关文献分析

• 特别策划·儿科护理研究进展 • 上一篇下一篇

早产儿疼痛评估工具使用研究相关文献分析

沈巧郑显兰

重庆医科大学附属儿童医院护理部

出版日期:2016-08-25 发布日期:2016-08-25
基金资助:
2013-2014 年度国家临床重点专科建设项目（国卫办医涵[2013] 544 号）

Current status of the research on preterms' pain assessment tools

Online:2016-08-25 Published:2016-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：分析国内外早产儿疼痛评估工具的研究、应用现状，为早产儿疼痛评估提供参考。方法：检索PubMed、中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI) 和万方医学网数据库近10 年有关早产儿疼痛评估的文献。结果：共纳入270 篇文献。其中临床实验类文献212 篇，有30 篇（14.15%) 未采用明确的疼痛评估工具，91 篇（42.92%）未对评估工具的信效度作出评价直接使用，92 篇（43.40%) 未明确指出评估量表得分对临床疼痛管理的指导意义。结论：国内外早产儿疼痛评估工具使用不规范的现象普遍存在，可能误导疼痛治疗，有必要进一步对早产儿疼痛评估进行规范。

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the research and application status of preterms' pain assessment tools in China and aboard, and to provide references for premature infants' pain assessment in China. Methods: PubMed, CNKI and Wanfang were searched for papers which described praterms' pain assessment for nearly 10 years. Results: A total of 270 papers were recruited including 212 clinical trials with 30 papers (14.15%) not using a pain assessment tool, 91 (42.92%)using tools directly without reliability and validity assessment, and 92 (43.40%) not defining the significance of tools to clinical pain management. Conclusion: It is a general phenomenon in China and abroad that the pain assessment tools were used irregularly, which mislead the pain treatment. It is necessary to regulate the application of preterms' pain assessment in China.

沈巧郑显兰. 早产儿疼痛评估工具使用研究相关文献分析[J]. , 2016, 16(8): 1057-1061.