主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

对造口专科护理相关临床实践指南质量的评价

薛冬群 柳琪 亢东琴 韩柳 苏春香 岳树锦   

  1. 北京中医药大学护理学院
  • 出版日期:2016-11-25 发布日期:2016-11-25

Evaluating the quality of clinical practice guidelines of ostomy care based

  • Online:2016-11-25 Published:2016-11-25

摘要: 目的:评价造口专科护理相关临床实践指南的质量,以分析当前造口护理相关临床实践指南的研究现状,为构建适合我国本土的造口护理临床实践指南提供参考。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普数据库(VIP)、万方数据库(WANFANG DATA)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、PubMed、ProQuest、Web of Science 数据库,以及与指南发布及指南资料相关的其他网站,检索时限为2006-2015 年。纳入公开发表的造口专科护理相关临床实践指南,语言为中文或英文,描述性分析纳入指南的名称、发表年份、发布机构、制定方法等内容。采用AGREE Ⅱ工具评价指南质量。结果:共纳入19 篇指南,其中美国9 篇,英国5 篇,加拿大3 篇,瑞典1 篇,中国1 篇。已获全文予以评价的指南有14 篇,指南的总体质量一般,A 级4 篇,B 级8 篇,C 级2 篇。AGREE Ⅱ 6 大领域平均得分依次为范围和目的(76.59%)、清晰性(74.01%)、参与人员(66.67%)、严谨性(51.93%)、应用性(46.73%)和编辑独立性(37.50%)。结论:造口专科护理领域的临床实践指南在严谨性、应用性和编辑独立性上要加强,注意清楚描述利益冲突;提倡基于循证制定指南,使用最佳证据;目前我国尚无本土化造口专科护理临床实践指南,建议借鉴国外经验,基于循证制定符合我国国情的造口专科护理临床实践指南。

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the quality of clinical practice guideline of ostomy care, to analyze the status quo and challenges in the guideline development, and to provide reference for making clinical practice guideline of ostomy care suitable for China. Methods: The databases of CNKI, VIP, WANFANG, CBM, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science,and related websites and data of guidelines were searched and the retrieval time was from 2006 to 2015. The published clinical guidelines of ostomy care were recruited and language was limited in Chinese and English. The names, publishing years, organizations, development methods were descriptively analyzed and the quality were assessed by AGREE II.Results: A total of 19 guidelines concerning ostomy care were included from USA, Britain, Canada, Sweden and China.Totally 14 full text guidelines of them had been assessed by AGREE II and they were generally low in quality. The levels of guidelines were level A (4 guidelines), level B (8 guidelines), and level C (2 guidelines). The scores of guidelines according to the domains of AGREE II decreased from "scope and purpose" (76.59%), "clarity of presentations" (74.01%),"participants" (66.67%), "rigour of development" (51.93%), "applicability" (46.73%), and "editorial independence" (37.50%).Conclusion: The guidelines of the ostomy care should be improved in "rigour of development", "applicability" and "editorial independence" in future. Conflicts of interest should be addressed. Guidelines are recommended to be developed based on evidence and to use the best evidence. There is still no local evidence-based guideline of the ostomy care in China. So it is urgent to develop evidence-based guideline that is suitable for Chinese condition while utilizing international experiences.