主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 461-467.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2024.03.027

• 专科管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

肺结核结构性肺病患者肺康复运动方案的构建

刘琳琳 陈敬芳 王秀芬 阮淑金 李孟君   

  1. 南华大学护理学院,421001 湖南省衡阳市(刘琳琳,陈敬芳,阮淑金,李孟君);深圳市第三人民医院科研教学部住陪办(陈敬芳);肺病医学部(王秀芬)
  • 出版日期:2024-03-15 发布日期:2024-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈敬芳,博士在读,主任护师,科研教学部住培办主任,E-mail:13823139640@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘琳琳,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    2022年深圳市自然科学基金项目(JCYJ20220530163403008)

Construction of pulmonary rehabilitation exercise program for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and structural lung disease

LIU Linlin, CHEN Jingfang, WANG Xiufen, RUAN Shujin, LI Mengjun   

  1. School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan province, 421001, China
  • Online:2024-03-15 Published:2024-03-15
  • Contact: E-mail:13823139640@163.com

摘要: 目的:构建肺结核结构性肺病患者肺康复运动方案,为其运动训练提供系统、规范的参考。方法:系统检索国内外数据库和网站中关于结构性肺病患者肺康复运动训练的文献。研究者独立评价文献并提取证据,形成方案初稿。采用德尔菲专家函询法进一步论证方案的可行性。结果:共纳入21篇文献,得到35条结构性肺病肺康复运动相关的证据。共16名专家参与两轮德尔菲专家函询,两轮函询的专家积极系数分别为88.89%和100.00%,专家权威系数分别为0.891和0.907。肺结核结构性肺病患者肺康复运动方案包括组建多学科团队、总体要求、评估内容、运动处方及效果评价5项一级条目、20项二级条目、43项三级条目。结论:肺结核结构性肺病患者肺康复运动方案科学、实用,可为临床开展肺结核结构性肺病患者的肺康复运动干预提供依据。

关键词: 肺结核;结构性肺病;肺康复;运动;循证实践方案

Abstract: Objective: To construct a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation exercise program for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and structural lung disease, and to establish a systematic and standardized reference for pulmonary rehabilitation exercise interventions. Methods: We systematically searched databases and websites for the literature on pulmonary rehabilitation exercise training in patients with structural lung disease. Investigators independently evaluated the literature and extracted evidence to form the initial draft of the program. The Delphi expert consultation method was used to further demonstrate the feasibility of the program. Results: A total of 21 studies were included, and 35 pieces of evidence related to pulmonary rehabilitation exercise for patients with structural lung disease were obtained. A total of 16 experts participated in two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, effective recovery rates of the questionnaire were 88.89% and 100.00%, and expert authority coefficients were 0.891 and 0.907, respectively. The program included the formation of a multidisciplinary team, general requirements, assessment component, exercise prescription, and effect evaluation 5 primary items, 20 secondary items, and 43 tertiary items. Conclusion: The pulmonary rehabilitation exercise program for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and structural lung disease is scientific and practical, which can provide a basis for clinical practice.

Key words: pulmonary tuberculosis; structural lung disease; pulmonary rehabilitation; exercise; evidence-based practice program

中图分类号:  R47;R197