主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 887-893.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.06.017

• 人力资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于实践能力业绩的江苏省护理高级职称评审标准研制

杨磊 顾则娟 林征 丁霞芬 李方 白云飞   

  1. 南京中医药大学护理学院,210023 南京市(杨磊,白云飞);南京医科大学第一附属医院/江苏省人民医院党委办公室(顾则娟);护理部(林征);内镜中心(丁霞芬);胸外科(李方)
  • 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 顾则娟,硕士,主任护师/教授,党委办公室主任,E-mail:jassicagu@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨磊,硕士在读
  • 基金资助:
    2022年江苏省研究生实践创新计划(SJCX22_0702);江苏省医学创新团队(苏卫科教〔2017〕1号)

Development of evaluation standards for senior nursing title based on practical ability performance: a case study of Jiangsu province

YANG Lei, GU Zejuan, LIN Zheng, DING Xiafen, LI Fang, BAI Yunfei   

  1. School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China
  • Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-15
  • Contact: E-mail:jassicagu@163.com

摘要: 目的:基于实践能力业绩研制江苏省护理高级职称评审标准,为《关于深化卫生专业技术人员职称制度改革的指导意见》的落地提供参考。方法:通过文献回顾、半结构访谈、专家会议、德尔菲法、层次分析法确立护理高级职称评审标准及各指标权重。结果:3轮函询问卷有效回收率分别为100.0%、96.7%、96.6%,专家权威系数分别为0.860、0.864、0.879,肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.216~0.317、0.161~0.297、0.191~0.267(P<0.01),最终形成的护理高级职称评审标准包括4个一级指标、9个二级指标、27个三级指标。结论:研制的护理高级职称评审标准科学、客观,导向实践能力业绩,符合护理专业特点和人才成长规律,能引导护士扎根临床,提升业务水平,推动护理服务高质量发展。

关键词: 专业技术职称;护理;德尔菲技术

Abstract: Objective: To develop the evaluation standards of senior nursing title in Jiangsu province based on practical ability performance, and to provide examples for the implementation of relevant guidance. Methods: We used literature review, semi-structured interview, expert meeting, Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to establish the evaluation standards of senior nursing title and the weight of each index. Results: The valid questionnaire recovery rates of the three rounds of consultation were 100.0%, 96.7% and 96.6%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.860, 0.864 and 0.879. The Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.216-0.317, 0.161-0.297 and 0.191-0.267 (P<0.01). The final evaluation criteria for senior nursing titles included 4 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators and 27 third-level indicators. Conclusion: The evaluation standards of senior nursing title is scientific and objective, oriented to practical ability performance, in line with the characteristics of the nursing profession and the law of talent growth, which can guide nurses to take root in the clinic, improve their professional level, provide more and better services, and promote the high-quality development of nursing.

Key words: professional and technical titles; nursing; Delphi technique

中图分类号:  R47;R197