主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 823-828.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.06.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

自我能力否定倾向量表的汉化及在医院护理管理者中的信度效度检验

彭莹 涂惠 马兆佳 熊晓云 郭婷 熊楚妍 程婷 陈祎慧 李雯欣   

  1. 南昌大学第二附属医院护理部,330006 南昌市(彭莹,涂惠,马兆佳,熊晓云,郭婷,熊楚妍);南昌大学护理学院(程婷,陈祎慧,李雯欣)
  • 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 涂惠,硕士,副主任护师,护理部主任,E-mail:12674789@qq.com
  • 作者简介:彭莹,硕士,护师
  • 基金资助:
    江西省研究生创新专项课题(YC2021-S181)

Translation and psychometric properties examination of the Chinese version of the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale among hospital nursing managers

PENG Ying, TU Hui, MA Zhaojia, XIONG Xiaoyun, GUO Ting, XIONG Chuyan, CHENG Ting, CHEN Yihui, LI Wenxin   

  1. Department of Nursing, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
  • Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-15
  • Contact: E-mail:12674789@qq.com

摘要: 目的:汉化自我能力否定倾向量表,以医院护理管理者为测验人群并检验其信度、效度。方法:对量表进行翻译、回译、原作者审核、跨文化调适和预调查,形成中文版自我能力否定倾向量表;2021年10月至2022年2月采用便利抽样法调查315名医院护理管理者,检验量表的信度和效度。结果:中文版自我能力否定倾向量表最终为8个条目,探索性因子分析提取心虚和自我否定2个因子,累计方差解释率为54.5%。验证性因子分析显示,修正的二因子模型拟合良好,χ2/df=2.225,P=0.002,GFI=0.952,AGFI=0.909,CFI=0.959,TLI=0.940,RMSEA=0.077。中文版自我能力否定倾向量表的Cronbach’s?α系数为0.837,2个因子Cronbach’s?α系数分别为0.847和0.701;重测信度为0.914。结论:中文版自我能力否定倾向量表在医院护理管理者中信度、效度较好,可用于自我能力否定倾向水平的评估,以期为开展相关研究提供参考。

关键词: 自我能力否定倾向;护理管理者;信度;效度;护理

Abstract: Objective: To translate the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale and test its reliability and validity among hospital nursing managers. Methods: The scale was translated, back-translated, and reviewed by the original author. The Chinese version of the instrument was established after cross-cultural adaptation pre-testing. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version scale were tested among 315 hospital nursing managers recruited by convenience sampling from October 2021 to February 2022. Results: The Chinese version of the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale had 8 items. The exploratory factor analysis identified 2 factors of fake and self-denial with a cumulative percentage of variance of 54.5%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the modified two-factor model fitted well (χ2/df=2.225, P=0.002, GFI=0.952, AGFI=0.909, CFI=0.959, TLI=0.940, RMSEA=0.077). The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version scale was 0.837, and Cronbach's α coefficients for the two factors were 0.847 and 0.701, respectively. The test-retest reliability was 0.914. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale has good reliability and validity among hospital nursing managers and can be used for the assessment of Impostor Phenomenon.

Key words: Impostor Phenomenon; nursing manager; reliability; validity; nursing

中图分类号:  R47;R197