主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

中国护理管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 6-11.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.01.002

• 特别策划·护士职业暴露风险防控 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理人员常见职业暴露监测与防护指标的构建

李伟 尚文涵 冯晶晶 安磊 么莉   

  1. 国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所护理管理与康复研究部,100044 北京市
  • 出版日期:2023-01-15 发布日期:2023-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 么莉,副主任护师,护理管理与康复研究部主任,国家护理专业质控中心主任,E-mail:moli_158@163.com
  • 作者简介:李伟,硕士,助理研究员

Preliminary establishment of common occupational exposure monitoring and protection indicators for nursing staff

LI Wei, SHANG Wenhan, FENG Jingjing, AN Lei, YAO Li   

  1. Department of Nursing Management and Rehabiliation Research, National Institute of Hospital Administration, NHC, Beijing, 100044, China
  • Online:2023-01-15 Published:2023-01-15
  • Contact: E-mail:moli_158@163.com

摘要: 目的:构建规范、统一的针对护理人员常见职业暴露的监测与防护指标。方法:通过文献查阅法,针对在护理人员职业暴露中发生频次较多且危害较大的锐器伤及抗肿瘤药物暴露两个方面的指标,形成备选指标池,通过小组讨论对指标的名称、定义及计算公式等进行界定,经过两轮专家函询和专家现场论证,确定了护理人员常见职业暴露监测与防护指标。再通过小样本试点,确定指标在数据采集与填报上的可行性与一致性。结果:共构建了6个护理人员常见职业暴露监测与防护指标,其中锐器伤暴露相关指标5个,抗肿瘤药物暴露相关指标1个。经试点填报,最终选取“锐器伤发生率”及“静脉用抗肿瘤药物开放环境下配置率”2个指标进行上线采集,并对其定义和计算公式进行统一界定,确保指标采集的可行性与一致性。结论:本研究构建的指标聚焦了护理人员职业暴露与防护工作的特点,兼具科学性和实用性,为全面、客观、真实了解我国护理人员职业暴露现状并制订有效的改善策略奠定了基础,对于提高临床对护理人员职业暴露风险的关注和重视程度,提升护理人员自身职业安全意识,降低护理人员职业暴露风险,推动临床护理质量提升具有重要意义。

关键词: 护理人员;职业暴露;锐器伤;抗肿瘤药物;指标

Abstract: Objective: To establish standardized and unified monitoring and protection indicators of common occupational exposure for nursing staff. Methods: Through the method of literature review, the sharp instrument injury and antineoplastic drug exposure were included as the common occupational exposure, which occurred frequently and caused great harm in the occupational exposure of nursing staff. The name, definition and calculation method of the indicators were defined through group discussion. After two rounds of expert written consultation and expert on-site discussion, 6 indicators were finally determined. Then small sample pilot study was performed. Results: A total of 6 indicators of occupational exposure monitoring and protection for nursing staff were finally determined, including 5 indicators related to sharp instrument injury exposure and 1 indicator related to antineoplastic drug exposure. After trial, two indicators, "incidence of sharp instrument injury" and "allocation rate of intravenous anti-tumor drugs in open environment", were finally selected for online collection. Conclusion: The indicators constructed in this study focus on the characteristics of nursing staff's occupational exposure and protection work, which are both scientific and practical. It is expected to enhance the understanding of the current situation of nursing staff's occupational exposure and formulating effective management strategies. It is also helpful for nursing managers to pay more attention to nursing staff's occupational exposure risks, and enhance the nurses' own occupational safety awareness. It is of positive significance to promote the improvement of clinical nursing quality.

Key words: nursing staff; occupational exposure; sharp instrument injury; antineoplastic drug; indicator