主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文版情绪和社会功能障碍量表用于脑卒中患者的信度效度检验

贺晴雯 刘春香 赵晨 陈双琴 段功香   

  1. 南华大学护理学院,421001 湖南省衡阳市(贺晴雯,刘春香,赵晨,段功香);南华大学附属第一医院(陈双琴)
  • 出版日期:2018-03-25 发布日期:2018-03-25
  • 基金资助:
    2017年湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX2017B562)

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Emotional and Social Dysfunction Questionnaire in stroke patients

  • Online:2018-03-25 Published:2018-03-25

摘要: 目的:对情绪和社会功能障碍量表(Emotional and Social Dysfunction Questionnaire,ESDQ)进行汉化,并对其中文版进行信度、效度检验。方法:采用方便抽样法选取369名衡阳市脑卒中患者进行调查,对原量表进行修订并形成最终量表。结果:中文版ESDQ Cronbach’s α系数为0.934,重测信度为0.916,分半信度为0.817,内容效度指数为0.930;探索性因子分析显示,提取的6个公因子累积方差贡献率为80.190%;验证性因子分析结果表明数据拟合良好。结论:中文版ESDQ具有较好的信度、效度,适宜作为中国背景下脑卒中患者情绪和社会功能障碍的评估工具。

Abstract: Objective: To translate the English version of the Emotional and Social Dysfunction Questionnaire (ESDQ) into Chinese, and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of ESDQ. Methods: A convenient sample of 369 stroke patients in Hengyang was investigated by the Chinese version of ESDQ. The original scale was revised and then the final scale was formed. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of ESDQ was 0.934, the test-retest reliability was 0.916, and the split-half reliability was 0.817. The content validity index was 0.930. Six factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and they could explain 80.190% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit model. Conclusion: The Chinese version of ESDQ has good reliability and validity, which can be used as a valid tool for measurement of emotional and social dysfunction among stroke patients in China.