主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

灵性照顾能力量表的汉化及信度效度检验

韦迪 刘翔宇 谌永毅 张敏 毛婷 扶雨露   

  1. 湖南省肿瘤医院/中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院护理部,410013 长沙市(韦迪,刘翔宇,谌永毅,张敏,毛婷);中南大学湘雅护理学院(扶雨露)
  • 出版日期:2017-12-25 发布日期:2017-12-25
  • 基金资助:
    中华护理学会2015-2016年度科研课题(ZHKY201506);湖南省自然科学基金项目(2015JJ4099);2017年中南大学研究生自主探索创新项目(2017zzts923);国家级大学生创新类项目(201710533333)

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Spiritual Care Competence Scale

  • Online:2017-12-25 Published:2017-12-25

摘要: 目的:汉化英文版灵性照顾能力量表(Spiritual Care Competence Scale,SCCS)并对翻译后的灵性照顾能力量表的信度、效度进行检测,验证其在国内的适用性。方法:对英文版灵性照顾能力量表(SCCS)进行翻译、回译和跨文化调适,确定中文版灵性照顾能力量表。采用方便抽样法对长沙市3所三级甲等医院的526名护理人员进行灵性照顾能力的问卷调查,并用所得数据进行信度、效度分析。结果:项目分析显示各条目临界比值均具有统计学意义(P<0.001),且各条目与SCCS总分的相关系数达到0.5以上;探索性因子分析结果显示,KMO值为0.954,共提取2个公因子,可解释总变异的77.43%,22个条目在相应主成分载荷均>0.4;验证性因子分析表明6因子模型优于2因子模型;总量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.974,各维度Cronbach’s α系数为0.902~0.956。总量表分半信度系数是0.892,各维度分半信度系数为0.904~0.950。结论:经过翻译、回译和跨文化调试后的中文版灵性照顾能力量表具有良好的信度、效度,可以有效地评估临床护理人员灵性照顾能力水平。

Abstract: Objective: To translate the English version of Spiritual Care Competence Scale (SCCS) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SCCS, and to explore its applicability in China. Methods: After receiving the author's approval, we translated and back-translate the scale, and adjusted the Chinese version of the scale for cultural adaptation. The questionnaire was distributed to 526 nurses in three tertiary hospitals in Changsha, Hunan Province by convenient sampling method. The reliability and validity of the scale were analyzed. Results: Item analysis indicated each item in the critical ratio was significant, and the correlation coefficients between each item and the total scores were higher than 0.5. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicated that Chinese version of SCCS consisted of 2 factors, which explained 77.43% of the total variance. The factor loadings of 22 items were all higher than 0.4. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that 6 factor model was better than the 2 factor model. The Cronbach's α of the whole scale and each dimension were 0.974, 0.939, 0.955, 0.941, 0.902, 0.956, and 0.949. The split-half reliability of the whole scale and each dimension were 0.892, 0.930, 0.928, 0.929, 0.904, 0.941, and 0.950. Conclusion: The Chinese version of SCCS has good reliability and validity and could be used as a tool to measure the spiritual care competence of nurses.