主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所
中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文版护理依赖量表在恶性肿瘤患者中应用的信度效度评价

韦小乐 凌瑛 何良妹 李燕 邱玉莲 姚静   

  1. 广西医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤内科,530007 南宁市(韦小乐);广西医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科一病区(凌瑛,何良妹,李燕,邱玉莲,姚静)
  • 出版日期:2017-07-25 发布日期:2017-07-25
  • 基金资助:
    2014年广西壮族自治区卫生厅自筹经费科研课题(Z2014074)

Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of Care Dependency Scale in cancer patients

  • Online:2017-07-25 Published:2017-07-25

摘要: 目的:检验中文版护理依赖量表在恶性肿瘤患者中应用的信度、效度。方法:应用中文版护理依赖量表(Care Dependency Scale,CDS)对329例恶性肿瘤患者进行问卷调查,通过探索性因子分析提取因子,通过计算Cronbach’s α系数和重测相关系数,检验问卷的内在一致性和重测信度。结果:中文版CDS量表经因子分析提取2个公因子,共14个条目,累积方差贡献率达69.8%;量表与ADL评分呈高度正相关(r=0.91,P<0.001),量表的内容效度指数(CVI)为0.833;Cronbach’s α系数是0.944,2个因子Cronbach’s α系数均为0.924;重测相关系数为0.667。

Abstract: Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Care Dependency Scale (CDS) in cancer patients. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-nine cancer patients were selected by convenience sampling. The construct validity was tested using an exploratory factor analysis, the reliaility was estimated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and rest-retest reliability. Results: Factor analysis identified two factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.8%. The Chinese version of CDS and ADL were significantly correlated (r=0.91, P<0.001). The content validity index was 0.833. The Cronbach’s α coefficient (0.944) and test-retest reliability (0.667) was acceptable. Conclusion: The Chinese version of CDS has high reliability and validity, which may be used for monitoring the level of CDS in Chinese cancer patients.