主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊 中国科技核心期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》入选期刊

Chinese Nursing Management ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 444-449.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2026.03.024

• Advanced Nursing Practice • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of training for the graded physical restraint nursing quality standard in ICU

CHEN Qiaoling, WU Yongjia, CHENG Huan, CHEN Chaiying, BIE Yuanyuan, ZHU Xuanjing   

  1. Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-15

Abstract: Objective: To establish a graded physical restraint nursing quality standard for ICU and conduct training to ICU nurses, to provide references for standardizing graded physical restraint nursing practices. Methods: From July to December 2023, a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial was conducted among 346 ICU nurses across 4 tertiary grade A hospitals in 4 cities in Fujian province. Using a cluster sampling approach, ICU nurses in 4 hospitals were sequentially randomized into 4 groups according to the stepped wedge design. Nurses in the control group received training based on the conventional physical restraint nursing quality standard, while those in the intervention group were trained according to the graded physical restraint nursing quality standard for the ICU. Evaluations included scores on the ICU Graded Physical Restraint Nursing Assessment Questionnaire, as well as the number of non-compliant items in physical restraint quality checks, physical restraint rate, duration of graded physical restraint, distribution of restraint levels, incidence of restraint-related complications, and unplanned extubation rate. Results: After training, the intervention group showed improved assessment scores and a reduction in non-compliant items during physical restraint quality checks. The physical restraint rate and the duration of grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ physical restraints were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group. Differences in physical restraint levels were also observed across intervention phases (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of physical restraint-related complications between the two groups (P>0.05), and no unplanned extubation events occurred in either group. Conclusion: The establishment, training and application of the ICU graded physical restraint nursing quality standard helpes ICU nurses to develop an awareness of the need to accurately assess the level of physical restraint and to manage the quality of lean physical restraint.

Key words: ICU; physical restraint; quality standard; Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

CLC Number: R47;R197