主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:国家卫生计生委医院管理研究所
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊 中国科技核心期刊
《中文核心期刊要目总览》入选期刊

Chinese Nursing Management ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 496-501.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.04.005

• Special Planning • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Studies of Systematic Reviews published in Chinese nursing core journals from 2015 to 2019: a Scoping Review

PANG Dong, ZHANG Qiuwen, JIN Sanli, LI Shipan, SUN Lina   

  1. Peking University School of Nursing, Peking University Health Science Center for Evidence-Based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Beijing, 100191, China
  • Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-15

Abstract: Objective: To explore the progress of the kinds, methodological quality and reporting quality of Systematic Reviews published in Chinese nursing core journals from 2015 to 2019. Methods: The JBI approach to the conduct of scoping reviews was followed. Results: Totally 740 studies were included. They were quantitative Systematic Reviews, qualitative Systematic Reviews, umbrella reviews, and Scoping Reviews. Totally 68.2% articles formulated research questions with all key elements. The average number of databases searched was 7.29±2.15 per article. The most popular databases searched were CNKI (95.5%) in Chinese and PubMed/Medline (92.8%) in English. Only 19.1% studies searched grey literature. The most popular critical appraisal tool was the Cochrane tool, followed by the JBI tools. More information should be provided in the report. Conclusion: The amount of Systematic Reviews published in Chinese nursing core journals increased steadily from 2015 to 2019. A variety of Systematic Reviews were conducted. The methodological quality and reporting quality of Systematic Reviews should be improved greatly, so that stronger evidences could be provided to enhance evidence-based nursing in China.

Key words: Systematic Review; evidence-based nursing; Scoping Review

CLC Number: 

  • R47